Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
Task-Based Learning to enhance the writing skill of English as a foreign
language in tenth-grade students
Aprendizaje basado en tareas para favorecer la habilidad de escritura de inglés como
lengua extranjera en los estudiantes de décimo grado
Lourdes Vanessa Mindiola Rivas (1)
Mónica Elva Vaca-Cárdenas (2)
1Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Ecuador, Correo: vamin21_12@hotmail.com, Código Orcid:
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9308-701X
2Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Ecuador, Correo: monica.vaca@utm.edu.ec, Código Orcid:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-3538. Contacto: vamin21_12@hotmail.com
Recibido: 11-03-2024 Aprobado:16-08-2024
Abstract
English is used as an international language to share information, knowledge, culture and
communication between people from all over the world. The teaching of any language involves
four language skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing) which students should master to
become proficient users of the target language. However, writing is seemed as the most difficult
and the least attractive for students. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the
effectiveness of TBL method to enhance writing proficiency in EFL in tenth-grade at Abdon
Calderon Fiscal Educational Unit. A longitudinal study was developed where writing knowledge
of students was measure and compared in two different moments, before and after the
implementation of a Task-based learning method. A mixed research methodology was applied. A
sample of 30 students was randomly selected for this study. Consequently, different
mathematical-statistical procedures were used to gather, organize and present information by
means of tables. The data were gathered from the written materials produced by the students as a
result of task cycles completion. The results showed that the Task-based learning method which
was implemented contributed to enhance student writing skills in English as a Foreign Language
learning.
Keywords: English; Task-based learning; strategy; writing.
Introduction
The teaching and learning process of any language involves four language skills (listening,
speaking, reading and writing) which students should master to become proficient users of the
target language. However, learning and teaching writing in a second language is seemed as the
most challenging task and the least attractive for students (Wijekumar, et al., 2019). In addition,
it needs to be emphasized that writing is shaped and controlled by the context in which it takes
place. In this paper, writing is assumed to be “a matter of mind, hand and heart, this involves the
following aspects; complex cognitive, physical, affective and social processes” (Myers, et al.,
2021, p. 10).
Then teaching and learning of writing are also regarded as complex tasks because of its dynamic
nature. Researchers considered that writing required extensive cognitive activity and planning.
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
Appropriately writhing processes require not only the active use of writing knowledge but positive
attitudes to deploy the knowledge and regulate learning behavior (Teng, Sun, & Xu, 2017).
Having said that, learning of writing takes considerable time for students to become proficiently
competent with the types of writing they are expected acquire when learning a foreign language
(L2). That is why, the acquisition of English as a L2 writing skills has gained significance with
the expansion of businesses as a result of the economic and cultural globalization (Alharbi, 2017).
In L2 writing assessment, different dimensions and indicators can be assumed to measure students
writing proficiency. It must be taken into account that when the student has the facility to use their
own experiences in a learning method, they effectively acquire the content and can develop the
skill they desire with continuous practice.
The importance of learning English based on tasks is that this strategy allows students to develop
learning skills with greater ease and better understanding, especially the ability to write, which is
a little more complex in another language. The main purpose of a longitudinal study is to
understand not just what the current situation is (the level of students' writing proficiency), but
also how things have changed or are going to change over time (what changes are expected in
writing proficiency of the tenth-students). Most researchers concluded that TBL improves the
student’s language skills (speaking, reading, listening and writing) (Afifah & Devana, 2020).
The problem worldwide when students learn English is to fluently acquire the communicative
skills, especially the skill of writing. Valli (2016) indicates that writing is an intellectual activity
that leads to verbal skills. Writing in actual sense means clear and effective communication in
written form. No magic formula will make writing quick and easy. One can master the art of
writing with constant practice. Writing is not inborn; it is to be learnt. According to Misbah (2017)
starting point of this study is the difficulty that students have in learning a new language, since it
is not their native language, it makes learning difficult, especially in adolescents, and the objective
of using specific task-based is to learn the skill of writing is to achieve: first the student's interest
and then gradually his progress in a rich and productive vocabulary in writing skills.
According to Cevallos (2022), The problem that has been seen in Ecuadorian public schools is
the lack of foundation and fluency that students have, so a question arises: can task-based learning
activities promote written fluency in English? as a foreign language? Based on the researcher's
preliminary observation, the students of the Abdón Calderón Fiscal Educational Unit show some
limitations in the students' writing ability such as: Students do not have motivation to write letters,
essays and paragraphs and students have difficulties to communicate written ideas based on real
life. contexts and situations.
In this research, it was noticed that the main problem is the lack of vocabulary and the lack of
study base in many students who are not motivated by their fear of knowing and learning a new
language, learning goes hand in hand with the experiences and demonstration of what was learned
in the classroom. Due to the lack of motivation, they also have learning deficiencies, therefore
developing writing skills is a challenge for teachers and a challenge for students.
GAP
Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of TBL method to
enhance writing proficiency in EFL in tenth-grade at Abdon Calderon Fiscal Educational Unit.
The current study addresses the following research questions: How can TBL method enhance the
writing skill of EFL?
The analysis presented in this article is that globally the main difficulty that students have when
learning a new language is the failure to fully develop skills, in this case writing, therefore the
strategy that will be used is Learning based on specific tasks to successfully develop the skill of
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
writing. In order to achieve our objective, we made a plan that highlighted the dates and
achievement goals in which we could achieve each goal successfully and thus demonstrate the
effectiveness of using this learning strategy.
Literature Review
The writing skill of English as a foreign language
Weir, (2005) considered four main dimensions of writing: structure an organization; content;
argumentation and language use; and mechanics where each dimension has five sub-dimensions.
A scale of five levels from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) respectively. Weir´s framework for
writing assessment was updated by (Wang & Han, 2017).
Becker, (2018) defined three general dimensions of writing: organization, content and language
use. Under each referred main dimension, there were a number of sub-dimensions. Each
dimension and sub-dimension were assessed separately with a scale of five scoring categories or
levels. The minimum possible score is 1 point, while the maximum possible score is 5 points.
The different levels of writing proficiency are indicated by both a number and a qualitative
description.
The skill of writing development is based on the level of each student and understanding that
other skills are intertwined and to develop one with the other you must have reached a
considerable level of each of the skills. Let us remember that the difficulties in learning to write
are based on the lack of practice and lack of time in preparing to study a foreign language.
Task-Based Learning
There are different approaches of teaching EFL. As students have different learning styles,
teachers should be creative to find new methods and strategies of teaching writing to satisfy
students diversity in terms of intelligence types, learning styles and cognitive development. Those
methods and strategies need to be holistic and need-based (Alharbi, 2017).
In fact, appropriate teaching methods positively impact in foreign language learning. In the 20th
century, different approaches and methods were introduced such as Grammar-translation Method,
Direct Method, Communicative Approach, and others. Task-based learning (TBL), also known
as Task-based language teaching (TBLT) and Task-based instruction (TBI) was originated from
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). As TBL was introduced in pedagogical practices it
has become a topic which caught researchers’ attention in recent decades (Liu & Ren, 2021). In
addition, TBL is adopted in English language curricula of different counties worldwide (Sholeh,
2020; Liu & Ren, 2021; and Waluyo, 2019). Published research works showed that English
language teachers hold positive attitudes on TBLT as a current EFL approach (Bhandari, 2020).
In the same direction, the students also have positive attitude towards TBL and considered TBL
activities as a good way to improve English as L2 (Afifah & Devana, 2020). Along with the
above-mentioned ideas, TBL has been stablished as an innovative approach which was developed
from the Communicative Approach (Sholeh, 2020). The literature review showed that TBL is
defined an activity, a process, a teaching approach, a teaching strategy or a teaching method. For
example, Sholeh, (2020); Safitri, Rafli, & Dewanti, (2020) and Bhandari, (2020) defined TBL as
an approach where students execute and utilize a meaningful task as the basis unit of the learning
process. TBL aimed at encouraging students to act at their own rhythm for processing and
reorganizing their inter-language. As a student-centered approach, TBL enhance students’ activity
rather than the activities of teachers.
The concept of TBL demand learning by doing. The students are expected to experience the
language by completing the meaningful tasks (Safitri, Rafli, & Dewanti, 2020). Whereas, (Al-
Tamimi, Muhsen Abudllah, & Ali Bin-Hady, 2020), define TBL as a method which involves
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
students in meaningful tasks using the target language. As referred, TBL involve students in
meaningful tasks which can be used to develop al language skills (speaking, reading, writing and
listening). Example of such tasks include creating a poster, producing newsletter, writing different
types of letters, creating a presentation, producing a video or a short movie, writing an article,
making a pamphlet, designing a map, among others (Willis, 2021). TBLT can be developed in
three stages or phases procedure, also known as TBLT cycle (Al-Tamimi, Muhsen Abudllah, &
Ali Bin-Hady, 2020):
Phase 1: Pre-Task.
Phase 2: During-Task: Task, Planning, Report.
Phase 3: Post-Task.
TBL can turn EFL teaching and learning a social and cultural activity (Arboleda & Castro, 2019)
where language is learned solving tasks from cultural and social issues. The distinctive feature of
TBL is meaningful task which is proposed as the main unit of language micro design (Waluyo,
2019). The main role of students in TBL is to complete the meaningful task appropriately and this
role include other roles such as group participation, monitoring, and risk-taker and innovator.
As a student-centered approach, the main role of the language teacher in TBL is to facilitate the
students learning throughout a meaningful task. Such tasks are directly related with real-life
problems and situations. In the meantime, teachers monitor students’ performance and intervenes
when necessary (Bhandari, 2020).
This paper assumed two variables of interest. The dependent variable or outcome is the writing
proficiency of students. Whereas the TBL method was defined as the independent variable. This
definition of variable was assumed from Hofman & Sutherland, (2018) mixed research approach
approach.
According to Hofman & Sutherland, (2018), the distintive feature of a longitudinal study is that
it gathers information or dataset from more than one point in time. Often before and after
implementation of a new teaching method or strategy, when two points in time are assumed. In
case that three instants were adopted, the information is gathered at the beginning, in the middle
and at the end of the study.
Materials and methods
A mixed research approach was applied in which qualitative and quantitative methods were used
at the same time (Hofman & Sutherland, 2018). The methodology assumed was in accordance
with the longitudinal study theory. This study not only explored what the current situation of
students' writing proficiency is but also what changes are expected in writing proficiency of the
tenth-students. If there is any change, the study included a statistical analysis to evaluate if those
changes are significant under a reasonable significant level.
Population or type of sampling
The participants of this study were 30 EFL students of tenth-grade of basic education from Fiscal
Abdon Calderon Educational Unit which is the total population. Abdon Calderon National
College was founded in 1970. This educational institution is located in a rural area at Abdon
Calderon Village, Portoviejo city. It became a government school on May 22nd, 1980 and it has a
great total of 866 students and 30 teachers distributed in two academic sessions, in the mornings
and in the afternoons.
TBLT method
In this paper, TBL is assumed as a method (Al-Tamimi, et al., 2020). The longitudinal study
consisted of a comparison of students writing performance in two specific scenarios, before (pre-
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
TBLT method) and after (pre-TBLT method) to track writing performance. To implement TBLT
method, a procedure (TBLT cycle) was applied which consists of three phases or stages (Gan &
Leung, 2020; and Safitri, Rafli, & Dewanti, 2020).
According to the referred researcher, the TBLT method can be applied in a form of cycle where
the phases of this cycle can be named as Pre-Task or Phase 1, During-Task or Phase 2 and Post-
Task or Phase 3). TBL comprises a real-world situation and the task.
The purpose of Pre-Task phase is to prepare learners to acquire the language by
meaningful tasks focus on the real-world contexts. After the new topic is introduced,
language expressions and vocabulary words which are needed to complete the task are
carefully reviewed.
During-Task phase, the learning process should be performed in the real-world context
situations which require written communication. In this phase, students are grouped and
include planning of individual and group work.
Post-Task phase enable students to practice the writing language activities. Learners are
encouraged to report their activities and feedback are given. The evaluation takes place
in the three stages.
In the TBL activity proposed, each dimension and sub-dimension is assessed separately with a
scale of five scoring categories or levels after the completion of the task cycle. The minimum
possible score is 1 point, while the maximum possible score is 5 points. The different levels of
writing performance could be indicated by both a number and a qualitative description. Table 1
shows the dimensions and sub-dimension used.
Table 1: Dimensions and sub-dimension of students writing performance. Source: (Becker,
2018).
Dimension
Sub-dimension
Organization
1. Main idea
2. Supporting details
3. Concluding sentence
4. Transition words
Content
5. Relevance to prompt
6. Key ideas from text
7. Idea development
Language Use
8. Grammatical features
9. Vocabulary items
10. Presence of language errors
Data analysis
Mathematics and statistics methods were used to describe, summarize and present dataset in form
of tables as well as look for patterns in order to make predictions or inferences regarding Task-
Based Learning and writing proficiency. Descriptive statistics included the methods for
measuring central tendencies such as mean. It also included methods for measuring variability as
range and standard deviation.
A T-Test was applied to compare means of each dimension and sub-dimension in order to track
writing performance. The purpose of T-Test is to explore if there is a significant different
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
between Pre-TBLT and Post-TBLT. An alternative hypothesis was assumed as  ,
with Ho as the null hypothesis. Taking into consideration that only three dimensions and nine
sub-dimensions were compared (a total of twelve, less than 30), a T-test was chosen as
hypothesis test.
The statistical analysis would help to analyze if there is a significant change in students writing
performance in terms of means and standard deviations. As it is well known, in EFL different
dimension can be assumed to measure writing performance of students. This study assumes the
dimension of writing performance proposed by Becker, (2018).
Results
Because the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of TBLT method to
enhance writing performance in EFL lessons of tenth-grade students, ten TBLT classes were
planned and implemented in a period of five weeks (two TBLT classes per week). TBL structure
comprises a title, a real-world situation and the task. Table 2 shows one example of TBLT which
was designed and implemented based on (Willis, 2021).
Table 2: Example of TBLT activity
Title: Job application
Real world situation: You were searching for a job which, in your opinion, would be in
accordance with your profession and educational level. Certain day, you were reading a
newspaper when you found a job advertisement you think is more appropriately for you taking
into consideration your competencies.
Objectives: To evaluate learner knowledge about writing skill of the task and topic acquired
during the class
Pre Task
In the pre-task, the teacher guides the students to begin with the organization of the work.
Organization
Main idea
Presentation of the topic
New Vocabulary
During Task
During the task the students introduce meaning that are required during task performance. They
will be use:
Content
Preparation of the work
Organization of ideas and use of learned vocabulary.
Post Task
In the post task the student will send the activity using the email or using social media in which
they will evidence the task carried out.
Language Use
Presentation of the activity.
Vocabulary items
Feedback on work done
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
Task: Write an application letter to the manager (your EFL teacher) and say what you think.
You may send the referred letter with your CV as an attachment. It could be sent by email or
using social media.
The students are expected to improve writing proficiency completing the task. As a result, an
email or an application letter as well as a CV must be written and graded. TBL activities might
be supported by showing pictures of advertisements taken from newspapers and magazines.
From teachers’ perspective, for grading such a TBL activity as well as students' writing
proficiency, a general method was assumed (Klimova, 2011). This referred method consists of
several steps which EFL teacher executed as follow:
1. Read the paper broadly without marking and getting the general idea of paper organization
and structure.
2. Reread the paper in details, mark errors and write comments.
3. Read paragraph by paragraph, thinking less about organization.
4. Reread the paper once again to get the overall purpose of the paper.
5. Write good and bad features as well as number of errors.
6. Write final comments, assign a grade, record information in the students file and compare
results with previous writing of the student.
Analysis, Interpretation
The statistical procedure made possible to organize the information of students writing
performance through a table, before and after the application of TBLT. The information was
processed with the aid of Microsoft Office Excel 2019. Students writing performance
dimensions, sub-dimensions, means, standard deviations (SD) and mean difference are displayed
in Table 3. Two particular moments, before and after TBLT implementation were selected. Those
point in time were identified as pre-TBLT method and post-TBLT method.
Table 1: Students writing performance dimensions, sub-dimensions, means, standard deviations
(SD) and mean difference
No
Sub-
dimension/Dimension
s
Pre-TBLT method
Post-TBLT
method
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Sub-d1
Main idea
1,88
0,33
4,10
0,23
Sub-d 2
Supporting details
1,97
0,39
4,13
0,29
Sub-d 3
Concluding sentence
1,99
0,36
4,09
0,26
Sub-d 4
Transition words
1,84
0,30
4,10
0,26
D1
Organization
1,90
0,34
4,12
0,26
Sub-d 5
Relevance to prompt
1,99
0,29
4,24
0,27
Sub-d 6
Key ideas from text
2,00
0,41
4,20
0,29
Sub-d 7
Idea development
1,96
0,24
4,19
0,28
D2
Content
1,98
0,32
4,21
0,28
Sub-d8
Grammatical features
2,00
0,28
4,19
0,24
Sub-d9
Vocabulary items
2,03
0,41
4,12
0,44
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
Sub-
d10
Presence of language
errors
1,98
0,27
4,14
0,30
D3
Language Use
2,00
0,32
4,15
0,33
To complete the study, it was necessary to apply a hypothesis test. A T-Test was assumed
considering that the pairs of dependent means were less than 30 (ten sub-dimensions and three
dimensions). The referred test would help to explore if there is any significative difference in
terms of students writing performance. The information was processed with the aid of an online
T-Test calculator. The statistical results of this hypothesis test are shown in Table 4.
Table 2: Results of T-Test
Sub-dimension
and Dimensions
Pre-TBLT
method (T1)
Post-TBLT
method (T2)
Dev
(T2-T1)
Dev
(Diff-M)
Sq. Dev
Sub-d1
1,88
4,10
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d2
1,97
4,13
-78
-54,31
2999,33
Sub-d3
1,99
4,09
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d4
1,84
4,10
-84
-60,31
3637,02
D1
1,90
4,12
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d5
1,99
4,24
-90
-66,31
4396,71
Sub-d6
2,00
4,20
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d7
1,96
4,19
-74
-50,31
2530,86
D2
1,98
4,21
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d8
2,00
4,19
-78
-54,31
2949,33
Sub-d9
2,03
4,12
3
26,69
712,48
Sub-d10
1,98
4,14
-75
-51,31
2632,48
D3
2,00
4,15
2
26,69
660,09
20
43,69
1909,02
3
26,69
712,48
-77
-53,31
2841,71
2
25,69
712,48
19
42,69
2841,71
3
26,69
712,48
-86
-62,31
660,09
2
25,69
1822,63
14
37,69
712,48
2
25,69
3882,25
15
37,69
660,09
M: -23,69
25,69
1420,71
660,09
1497,09
38,69
S: 44363,54
Significance Level: 0.05
Difference Scores Calculations:


 
 
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
 


T-value Calculation:
󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜


A difference in all sub-dimensions and dimensions of students writing performance was observed
after implementation of TBLT method. As shown in Table 4, Sub-d1 (Main idea) experienced a
mean increment from 1,88 to 4,10 (a difference of +2,22). The same happened with D2 (Content)
which experience an increment from 1,98 to 4,21 (a difference of +2,23).
The highest improvement was observed in Sub-d4 (Transition words) which experienced a change
in mean from 1,84 to 4,10 (a difference of +2,26). The least improvement was observed in Sub-
d9 (Vocabulary items) which experienced a change in mean from 2,03 to 4,12 (an increment in
mean of +2,09). Comparing dimensions of students writing proficiency, the highest improvement
was observed in D2 (Content) which experienced a change in mean from 1,98 to 4,21 (a difference
of +2,23). The least improvement was observed in D3 (Language Use). It experienced a change
in mean from 2,00 to 4,15 (an increment in mean of +2,15).
The statistical procedure implemented reveled a p value of 0.00828 which is less than the
significance level of 0,05. As a result of the p value found, the null hypothesis is rejected. This
result showed that there is a significant difference in in terms of students writing performance
between Pre-TBLT and Post-TBLT means. In fact, the implementation of TBLT method
significatively enhance students writing performance in EFL.
Discussion
The findings provided evidence of the appropriateness and adequacy of TBLT in EFL writing
assessments. Results demonstrated that this method is very significant in the process of learning
a foreign language and for improving the writing skill. Pérez (2021) by Rai Zahoor Ahmed (2015)
indicated that there was an improvement in L2 performance indicators with Task-Based Learning
in terms of complexity, fluency and accuracy.
The improvement that was observed was in the Supporting details and Transition words, this
indicates that the vocabulary that students acquire through task-based learning is very significant,
as indicated by Milarisa (2019), of course, who makes it clear in her research since there were a
significant effect on the students who were taught by TBLT using Supporting details and
Transition words.
Researchers considered writing as a complex process (Weir, 2005; Wijekumar, et al., 2019 and
Myers, et al., 2021). That is why, considerable research papers have been published during the
past few decades to assess writing in EFL. In that regards, different dimensions and indicators
have been defined to measure students writing proficiency. Becker, (2018), writing assessment
framework and rating scale can be used for assessing students writing proficiency in EFL
classrooms.
The literature review showed that TBL is defined, indistinctively as an activity (Safitri, Rafli, &
Dewanti, 2020), a teaching approach (Sholeh, 2020 & Bhandari, 2020) and a teaching method
(Al-Tamimi, et al., 2020 and Gan & Leung, 2020) but in this study it was assumed as a method.
Currently, TBL method had won popularity and had been adopted in English language curricula
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
of different counties worldwide (Sholeh, 2020; Liu & Ren, 2021; & Waluyo, 2019). The findings
of this paper reveled TBL method enhance writing proficiency in EFL lessons.
As a student-centered method, TBL gives students a chance to execute and utilize a contextualized
meaningful task as the basis unit of the learning process as a result students improve and develop
their writing skill, indicating its usefulness in the EFL context. Such a finding is consistent with
(Bhandari, 2020; Gan & Leung, 2020; and Safitri, Rafli, & Dewanti, 2020) research works.
Valli (2016) says in his research, which indicates that Writing is a productive skill which needs
more participation and interest. As a result of his research he indicates that The task-based
approach has proven to be successful approach to developing students writing skills in Any level.
The most noteworthy limitation stems from the fact that, this paper only explored the impact of
TBL on writing skill, limiting the scope of this study. Future studies will explore TBLT impact
on other skills such as reading, speaking and listening.
Comparing the means values and standard differences of students writing performance
corroborate that there was an increment in all dimensions and sub-dimension of writing
proficiency of tenth-grade student at the Abdon Calderon Fiscal Educational Unit. Similar results
were found by Gonzalez & Pinzon (2019). They found improvement in Lexical Complexity
between the pretest and posttest in learners’ L2 performance, presents difference of written L2
Fluency between Pretest and Posttest of the experimental group, describes that the treatment of
TBLT to the experimental group has increased L2 accuracy measure in writing skill. Their results
indicate that there are no significant differences in the pretest scores and posttest scores of L2
performance triad within the control group but in case of the experimental group there are
statistical significances in the scores of L2 performance indicators, complexity, fluency and
accuracy.
Comparing this research with other research, we notice that the result is similar and that students
significantly improve their learning of the English language and improve their writing skills
using basic tasks.
Conclusions
The study evaluated the effectiveness of TBL method to enhance students writing performance in
EFL lessons. As the students were exposed to different meaningful task components to improve
writing performance, students felt more comfortable practicing writing in each TBLT cycle. After
the use of TBLT, the students got better score when perform EFL. Students used various kinds of
vocabulary based on real-world context and enjoyed learning writing.
The results of the hypothesis test supported the alternative hypothesis (Ha: μ≠H). It was concluded
that there is a significant difference between pre-TBLT means and post-TBLT means in terms of
writing proficiency of tenth-grade students at Abdon Calderon High School which took part in
the study. In other words, TBLT method contributed to enhance writing proficiency of students
in EFL lessons.
Based on the findings it is concluded that the introduction of the task-based learning method
produced transformations in students' knowledge, particularly with regard to writing or
relationships in English as a Foreign Language. However, there are some aspects in this study
that could be strengthened in future research works. Such aspects could include the size of the
sample as well as the impact of TBLT on reading, speaking and listening skills.
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
Bibliography
1. Afifah, N., & Devana, T. (2020). Speaking Skill through Task Based Learning in English
Foreign Language Classroom. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching), 7(2),
135-144. doi:10.33394/jo-elt.v7i2.3109
2. Alharbi, S. H. (2017). Principled Eclecticism: Approach and Application in Teaching
Writing to ESL/EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 33-39.
doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p33
3. Al-Tamimi, N. O., Muhsen Abudllah, N. K., & Ali Bin-Hady, W. R. (2020). Teaching
speaking skill to EFL college students through task-based approach: problems and
improvement. British Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 113-130.
4. Arboleda, A., & Castro, A. Y. (2019). Fostering Language Learning in the University
EFL Classroom through Literature: A Task-Based Approach. Gist Education and
Learning Research Journal, 101-127. doi/ org/10.26817/16925777.706
5. Barkaoui, K. (2007). Teaching Writing to Second Language Learners: Insights from
Theory and Research. TESL Reporter, 40(1), 35-48.
6. Becker, A. (2018). Not to scale? An argument-based inquiry into the validity of an L2
writing rating scale. Assessing Writing(37), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.01.001
7. Bhandari, L. P. (2020). Task-Based Language Teaching: A Current EFL Approach.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 1-5. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.1
8. Gan, Z., & Leung, C. (2020). Illustrating formative assessment in task-based language
teaching. ELT Journal, 74(1), 10-19. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccz048
9. Hofman, J., & Sim, M. (2018). Chapter two: Developing this collection and user guide.
En J. Hofman, & A. Sutherland, Desk-based research (págs. 9-17). Cambridge: RAND
Corporation.
10. Hofman, J., & Sutherland, A. (2018). Desk-Based Research. Cambridge: RAND
Corporation.
11. Klimova, B. F. (2011). Evaluating writing in English as a second language. Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences(28), 390 394. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.074
12. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2017). Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating
scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321-336. doi: 10.1177/0265532216663991
13. Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021). Task-based language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese
university teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 00(0), 117.
doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044247
14. Lumley, T. (2002). Assessing Second Language Writing: The Rater's Perspective.
Language Testing, 19(3), 246276. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt230oa
15. Myers, J., et al., (2021). What about Writing?: A National Study of Writing Instruction
in Teacher Preparation Programs. Literacy Research and Instruction. Routledge, 1-16.
doi:10.1080/19388071.2016.1198442
16. Safitri, H., Rafli, Z., & Dewanti, R. (2020). Improving Students’ Speaking Skills through
Task-Based Learning: An Action Research at the English Departmen. International
Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU), 7(6), 88-99.
doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1647
17. Sholeh, M. B. (2020). Implementation of Task-based Learning in Teaching English in
Indonesia: Benefits and Problems. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature,
15(1), 1-9. doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i1.26004
Revista Sinapsis. ISSN 1390 9770
Periodo. Julio Diciembre 2024
Vol. 25, Nro. 2, Publicado 2024-12-31
https://www.itsup.edu.ec/sinapsis
18. Teng, L. S., Sun, P. P., & Xu, L. (2017). Conceptualizing Writing Self-Efficacy in English
as a Foreign Language Contexts: Scale Validation Through Structural Equation
Modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 0(0), 1-32. doi: 10.1002/tesq.432
19. Waluyo, B. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching and Theme-Based Role-Play:
Developing EFL Learners’ Communicative Competence. Electronic Journal of Foreign
Language Teaching, 16(9), 153168.
20. Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2017). Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Control of
Writing Strategy between High- and Low-performing Chinese EFL Writers. Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 523-532. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993
21. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Wijekumar, et al., (2019). The roles of writing knowledge, motivation, strategic
behaviors, and skills in predicting elementary students’ persuasive writing from source
material. Read Write(32), 1431-145. doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9836-7
23. Willis, J. (2021). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Book Ltd.